spring 提供的编程式aop实现，即通过 ProxyFactory类完成的。

另外AnnotationAwareAspectJAutoProxyCreator BeanNameAutoProxyCreator DefaultAdvisorAutoProxyCreator 等自动aop代理创建器都是通过在其父类AbstractAutoProxyCreator中通过ProxyFactory 来实现aop逻辑的植入。所以理解ProxyFactory 的使用对理解spring aop 至关重要。

分析ProxyFactory 可以从两条线来分析：

1、代理对象的创建

2、method的调用以及拦截器（Advice）的织入。

使用方式：

[b]业务逻辑[/b]

public class LoginServiceImpl implements LoginService {
	public boolean login(User user) {
		System.out.println(user);
		if (user == null) {
			return false;
		} else if (user.getUsername() == "xinchun.wang" && user.getPassword() == "123456") {
			return true;
		}
		return false;
	}
}

[b]addvice增强[/b]

public class AfterAdvice1 implements AfterReturningAdvice{

	public void afterReturning(Object returnValue, Method method,
			Object[] args, Object target) throws Throwable {
		System.out.println("AfterAdvice1.afterReturning() execute ");
	}
}
//
public class AfterAdvice2 implements AfterReturningAdvice{

	public void afterReturning(Object returnValue, Method method,
			Object[] args, Object target) throws Throwable {
		System.out.println("AfterAdvice2.afterReturning() execute ");

	}
}

public class BeforeAdvice1 implements MethodBeforeAdvice{
	public void before(Method method, Object[] args, Object target)
			throws Throwable {
		System.out.println("BeforeAdvice1.before() execute ");
	}
}

public class BeforeAdvice2 implements MethodBeforeAdvice{

	public void before(Method method, Object[] args, Object target)
			throws Throwable {
		System.out.println("BeforeAdvice2.before() execute ");
	}

}

[b]测试用例：[/b]

@Test
	public void proxyLoginTest() {
		ProxyFactory factory = new ProxyFactory();
		factory.addAdvice(new BeforeAdvice1());
		factory.addAdvice(new BeforeAdvice2());
		factory.addAdvice(new AfterAdvice1());
		factory.addAdvice(new AfterAdvice2());
		LoginService target = new LoginServiceImpl();
		factory.setTarget(target);
		factory.setProxyTargetClass(false);
		factory.setInterfaces(new Class[]{LoginService.class});

		LoginService service = (LoginService)factory.getProxy();
		System.out.println(service.login(new User("xinchun.wang","123456")));
	}

输出：

BeforeAdvice1.before() execute

BeforeAdvice2.before() execute

User [username=admin, password=123456, open=false]

AfterAdvice2.afterReturning() execute

AfterAdvice1.afterReturning() execute

true

[b]数据结构：[/b]

ProxyConfig： 代理的基础配置属性

AdvisedSupport：提供基础的Advice的包装，Advisor 列表的维护，TargetSource 对象的维护，以及Interceptor 数据结构的解析和封装。

ProxyCreatorSupport：代理工厂的基类，主要负责代理对象的生成。

ProxyFactory：最常用的代理工厂应用，包含一些静态工厂方法，以及代理对象生成的方法。

public class ProxyFactory extends ProxyCreatorSupport {
//指定待实现接口和拦截器
   public ProxyFactory(Class proxyInterface, Interceptor interceptor) {
		addInterface(proxyInterface); //JDK代理需要接口
		addAdvice(interceptor);//添加增强逻辑
	}
}

//通过指定一个目标对象，构造ProxyFactory，可以继续通过addAdvice(interceptor);添加拦截器
public ProxyFactory(Object target) {
		Assert.notNull(target, "Target object must not be null");
		setInterfaces(ClassUtils.getAllInterfaces(target));
		setTarget(target);
	}

//生成代理对象,createAopProxy 在ProxyCreatorSupport 中实现
public Object getProxy() {
		return createAopProxy().getProxy();
	}

}

代理创建分析线

ProxyCreatorSupport 提供的createAopProxy() 提供了aopProxy的生成

/** 代理工厂的基类，提供了对 AopProxyFactory 的包装*/
public class ProxyCreatorSupport extends AdvisedSupport {
  //代理工厂，默认实现 DefaultAopProxyFactory 提供了 JdkDynamicAopProxy 和 Cglib2AopProxy 的生成
	private AopProxyFactory aopProxyFactory; 
  //aop配置的监听器
	private List<AdvisedSupportListener> listeners = new LinkedList<AdvisedSupportListener>();

	/** Set to true when the first AOP proxy has been created */
	private boolean active = false;

	/**
	 * 默认实现，指定DefaultAopProxyFactory 为默认aop代理生成工厂
	 */
	public ProxyCreatorSupport() {
		this.aopProxyFactory = new DefaultAopProxyFactory();
	}

	/**
	 * 同上自定义一个AopProxyFactory，来实现aop代理对象的生成
	 */
	public ProxyCreatorSupport(AopProxyFactory aopProxyFactory) {
		Assert.notNull(aopProxyFactory, "AopProxyFactory must not be null");
		this.aopProxyFactory = aopProxyFactory;
	}
	/**
	 *留给子类调用的代理生成，此次是aop代理生成的入口
	 */
	protected final synchronized AopProxy createAopProxy() {
		if (!this.active) { //第一次激活的时候，调用相关的监听器
			activate();
		}
		return getAopProxyFactory().createAopProxy(this); //通过aop代理工厂 生成AopProxy
	}

}

代理创建分析线 DefaultAopProxyFactory 的 createAopProxy 方法

 

/** 默认的代理工厂实现 

当 optimize =true或proxyTargetClass=ture 或 no proxy interfaces 指定，使用CGLIB 来生成代理，否则jdk代理 

*/ 

public class DefaultAopProxyFactory implements AopProxyFactory, Serializable { 

 

 /** 检查CGLIB2 相关类是否存在 */ 

 private static final boolean cglibAvailable = 

 ClassUtils.isPresent("net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer", DefaultAopProxyFactory.class.getClassLoader()); 

 

 

 public AopProxy createAopProxy(AdvisedSupport config) throws AopConfigException { 

 //optimize =true或proxyTargetClass=ture 或 no proxy interfaces 指定，使用CGLIB 来生成代理 

 //optimize 做优化，早期jdk的代理的生成相当慢，不过现在基本差异不大 

 if (config.isOptimize() || config.isProxyTargetClass() || hasNoUserSuppliedProxyInterfaces(config)) { 

 Class targetClass = config.getTargetClass(); 

 if (targetClass == null) { //被代理的对象不能为空 

 throw new AopConfigException("TargetSource cannot determine target class: " + 

 "Either an interface or a target is required for proxy creation."); 

 } 

 if (targetClass.isInterface()) { //虽然符合以上要求，但是如果代理对象是借口，那么继续使用jdk 

 return new JdkDynamicAopProxy(config); 

 } 

 if (!cglibAvailable) { 

 throw new AopConfigException( 

 "Cannot proxy target class because CGLIB2 is not available. " + 

 "Add CGLIB to the class path or specify proxy interfaces."); 

 } 

 return CglibProxyFactory.createCglibProxy(config); // Cglib2 代理 

 } 

 else { 

 return new JdkDynamicAopProxy(config); //jdk 代理 

 } 

 } 

 

 /** 

 * 判断是否有接口 

 */ 

 private boolean hasNoUserSuppliedProxyInterfaces(AdvisedSupport config) { 

 Class[] interfaces = config.getProxiedInterfaces(); 

 return (interfaces.length == 0 || (interfaces.length == 1 && SpringProxy.class.equals(interfaces[0]))); 

 } 

 

 /** 

 * 创建Cglib2AopProxy 

 */ 

 private static class CglibProxyFactory { 

 public static AopProxy createCglibProxy(AdvisedSupport advisedSupport) { 

 return new Cglib2AopProxy(advisedSupport); 

 } 

 } 

} 

代理创建分析线 举例 JdkDynamicAopProxy 的getProxy 方法

/**
 * 基于JDK动态代理 的Aop代理实现
   通过JDK代理的方法调用 只对接口中的方法做拦截
   即使真实对象不是线程安全的，通过JdkDynamicAopProxy 产生的对象依然是线程安全的。
 */
final class JdkDynamicAopProxy implements AopProxy, InvocationHandler, Serializable {

	private static final long serialVersionUID = 5531744639992436476L;

	/** We use a static Log to avoid serialization issues */
	private static Log logger = LogFactory.getLog(JdkDynamicAopProxy.class);

	/** aop的配置信息（增强逻辑，真是对象，切点信息） */
	private final AdvisedSupport advised;

	/** 代理接口是否有equals方法
	 */
	private boolean equalsDefined;

	/** 代理借口是否有hashCode方法
	 */
	private boolean hashCodeDefined;


	public JdkDynamicAopProxy(AdvisedSupport config) throws AopConfigException {
		Assert.notNull(config, "AdvisedSupport must not be null");
		if (config.getAdvisors().length == 0 && config.getTargetSource() == AdvisedSupport.EMPTY_TARGET_SOURCE) {
			throw new AopConfigException("No advisors and no TargetSource specified");
		}
		this.advised = config;
	}

  /** 获取代理*/
	public Object getProxy() {
		return getProxy(ClassUtils.getDefaultClassLoader());
	}

/**  至此方法结束，通过jdk生成代理对象已经完成*/
	public Object getProxy(ClassLoader classLoader) {
		if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
			logger.debug("Creating JDK dynamic proxy: target source is " + this.advised.getTargetSource());
		}
		Class[] proxiedInterfaces = AopProxyUtils.completeProxiedInterfaces(this.advised); //找到所有借口
		findDefinedEqualsAndHashCodeMethods(proxiedInterfaces);
		return Proxy.newProxyInstance(classLoader, proxiedInterfaces, this); //生成代理
	}

	/**
	 * 检查是否定义了hashCode  equals 方法 
	 */
	private void findDefinedEqualsAndHashCodeMethods(Class[] proxiedInterfaces) {
		for (Class proxiedInterface : proxiedInterfaces) {
			Method[] methods = proxiedInterface.getDeclaredMethods();
			for (Method method : methods) {
				if (AopUtils.isEqualsMethod(method)) {
					this.equalsDefined = true;
				}
				if (AopUtils.isHashCodeMethod(method)) {
					this.hashCodeDefined = true;
				}
				if (this.equalsDefined && this.hashCodeDefined) {
					return;
				}
			}
		}
	}

	/**
	 * 这里是代理对象调用，也是jdk代理 实现的核心逻辑
	 */
	public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable {
		MethodInvocation invocation;
		Object oldProxy = null;
		boolean setProxyContext = false;

		TargetSource targetSource = this.advised.targetSource;
		Class targetClass = null;
		Object target = null;

		try {
			if (!this.equalsDefined && AopUtils.isEqualsMethod(method)) { //如果代理的是equlas 方法
				return equals(args[0]);
			}
			if (!this.hashCodeDefined && AopUtils.isHashCodeMethod(method)) { //如果代理的是hashCode方法
				// The target does not implement the hashCode() method itself.
				return hashCode();
			}
			if (!this.advised.opaque && method.getDeclaringClass().isInterface() &&
					method.getDeclaringClass().isAssignableFrom(Advised.class)) {
				// Service invocations on ProxyConfig with the proxy config...
				return AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(this.advised, method, args);
			}

			Object retVal;

			if (this.advised.exposeProxy) { // 是否允许把当前代理放到AopContext中，这样可以保存在ThreadLocal中，在代码里使用AopContext.currentProxy() 获取当前代理
				// Make invocation available if necessary.
				oldProxy = AopContext.setCurrentProxy(proxy);
				setProxyContext = true;
			}

			// 获取目标对象以及Class类型
			target = targetSource.getTarget();
			if (target != null) {
				targetClass = target.getClass();
			}

			// 根据Method 和 targetClass 获取对应的拦截器（Advice增强封装） 这里是获取拦截逻辑的地方。（MethodMatcher 和 ClassFilter 在此处做匹配）
			List<Object> chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method, targetClass);

			// 如果没有配置，或者没有匹配到任何方法，那么直接调用当前实例的方法即可
			if (chain.isEmpty()) {
				retVal = AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(target, method, args);
			}
			else {
				// ReflectiveMethodInvocation 类封装了 增强和实例方法的调用
				invocation = new ReflectiveMethodInvocation(proxy, target, method, args, targetClass, chain);
				//aop的增强的植入 精华全在于此
				retVal = invocation.proceed();
			}

			// Massage return value if necessary.
			if (retVal != null && retVal == target && method.getReturnType().isInstance(proxy) &&
					!RawTargetAccess.class.isAssignableFrom(method.getDeclaringClass())) {
				retVal = proxy;
			}
			return retVal;
		}
		finally {
			if (target != null && !targetSource.isStatic()) {
				targetSource.releaseTarget(target);
			}
			if (setProxyContext) {
				AopContext.setCurrentProxy(oldProxy); //恢复currentProxy
			}
		}
	}

}

代理方法调用分析线

JdkDynamicAopProxy 实现InvocationHandler，其方法 public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable 会拦截所有通过代理调用的方法（如果对此不清楚，建议了解jdk的动态代理的实现）因此invoke就是调用的入口

基于以上分析，先看看拦截器对象的获取。 AdvisedSupport 的 getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice 方法

public List<Object> getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(Method method, Class targetClass) {
		MethodCacheKey cacheKey = new MethodCacheKey(method);
		List<Object> cached = this.methodCache.get(cacheKey);
		if (cached == null) {
			cached = this.advisorChainFactory.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(
					this, method, targetClass);
			this.methodCache.put(cacheKey, cached);
		}
		return cached;
	}

从上面代码可以看出，是做了缓存，如果缓存不存在，通过 AdvisorChainFactory.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice 来获取。 注意 这里把拦截器的获取委托的同时，仅仅提供了缓存功能，其他功能都进行了委托。

代理方法调用分析线 -拦截器的获取

/** 此类的实现的唯一功能就是从Advised中，根据method 和 targetClass 实现拦截器的获取*/
public class DefaultAdvisorChainFactory implements AdvisorChainFactory, Serializable {

	public List<Object> getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(
			Advised config, Method method, Class targetClass) {

		List<Object> interceptorList = new ArrayList<Object>(config.getAdvisors().length);
		//判断是否有引介增强
		boolean hasIntroductions = hasMatchingIntroductions(config, targetClass);
		//AdvisorAdapterRegistry 是对advice 的包装为MethodInterceptor 工具
		AdvisorAdapterRegistry registry = GlobalAdvisorAdapterRegistry.getInstance();
		for (Advisor advisor : config.getAdvisors()) {
			if (advisor instanceof PointcutAdvisor) { //如果是PointcutAdvisor，那么要对方法和类做匹配
				// Add it conditionally.
				PointcutAdvisor pointcutAdvisor = (PointcutAdvisor) advisor;
				if (config.isPreFiltered() || pointcutAdvisor.getPointcut().getClassFilter().matches(targetClass)) { //如果类匹配
				  // registry.getInterceptors(advisor) 这句话就是对Advice ->MethodInterceptor 包装
					MethodInterceptor[] interceptors = registry.getInterceptors(advisor);
					MethodMatcher mm = pointcutAdvisor.getPointcut().getMethodMatcher();
					if (MethodMatchers.matches(mm, method, targetClass, hasIntroductions)) { //如果方法也匹配
						if (mm.isRuntime()) { //如果是运行时判断，会考虑参数等因素
							for (MethodInterceptor interceptor : interceptors) {
								interceptorList.add(new InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher(interceptor, mm));
							}
						}
						else { //不是运行时，直接添加
							interceptorList.addAll(Arrays.asList(interceptors));
						}
					}
				}
			}
			else if (advisor instanceof IntroductionAdvisor) { //引介增强
				IntroductionAdvisor ia = (IntroductionAdvisor) advisor;
				if (config.isPreFiltered() || ia.getClassFilter().matches(targetClass)) { //引介增强只需匹配类，即可
					Interceptor[] interceptors = registry.getInterceptors(advisor);
					interceptorList.addAll(Arrays.asList(interceptors));
				}
			}
			else { //如果不是PointcutAdvisor 也不是 IntroductionAdvisor，那么直接包装，默认是匹配的
				Interceptor[] interceptors = registry.getInterceptors(advisor);
				interceptorList.addAll(Arrays.asList(interceptors));
			}
		}
		return interceptorList;
	}

	/**
	 * 判断targetClass 是否匹配Advised中的任意一个Advisor
	 */
	private static boolean hasMatchingIntroductions(Advised config, Class targetClass) {
		for (int i = 0; i < config.getAdvisors().length; i++) {
			Advisor advisor = config.getAdvisors()[i];
			if (advisor instanceof IntroductionAdvisor) {
				IntroductionAdvisor ia = (IntroductionAdvisor) advisor;
				if (ia.getClassFilter().matches(targetClass)) {
					return true;
				}
			}
		}
		return false;
	}

}

代理方法调用分析线 AdvisorAdapterRegistry 通过getInterceptors 对Advisor 包装，返回MethodInterceptor 的逻辑。

DefaultAdvisorAdapterRegistry 类这个接口的默认实现

/** 对advice 的包装为MethodInterceptor 功能*/
public class DefaultAdvisorAdapterRegistry implements AdvisorAdapterRegistry, Serializable {
	private final List<AdvisorAdapter> adapters = new ArrayList<AdvisorAdapter>(3);
	/**
	 * 构造方法中默认注册最常用的三个Advice的适配器
	 */
	public DefaultAdvisorAdapterRegistry() {
		registerAdvisorAdapter(new MethodBeforeAdviceAdapter());
		registerAdvisorAdapter(new AfterReturningAdviceAdapter());
		registerAdvisorAdapter(new ThrowsAdviceAdapter());
	}

  //把advice 包装成Advisor
	public Advisor wrap(Object adviceObject) throws UnknownAdviceTypeException {
		if (adviceObject instanceof Advisor) {
			return (Advisor) adviceObject;
		}
		if (!(adviceObject instanceof Advice)) { //如果不是advice ，直接抛出异常
			throw new UnknownAdviceTypeException(adviceObject);
		}
		Advice advice = (Advice) adviceObject;
		if (advice instanceof MethodInterceptor) { //如果环绕拦截器，那么通过DefaultPointcutAdvisor包装
			return new DefaultPointcutAdvisor(advice);
		}
		for (AdvisorAdapter adapter : this.adapters) { //通过构造方法中的适配器来判断是否支持
			// Check that it is supported.
			if (adapter.supportsAdvice(advice)) {
				return new DefaultPointcutAdvisor(advice);
			}
		}
		throw new UnknownAdviceTypeException(advice);
	}

  //把advisor 包装为MethodInterceptor 列表，因为advisor 的Advice可能实现了MethodBeforeAdvice 同时也实现了 AfterReturningAdvice
	public MethodInterceptor[] getInterceptors(Advisor advisor) throws UnknownAdviceTypeException {
		List<MethodInterceptor> interceptors = new ArrayList<MethodInterceptor>(3);
		Advice advice = advisor.getAdvice();
		if (advice instanceof MethodInterceptor) {
			interceptors.add((MethodInterceptor) advice);
		}
		for (AdvisorAdapter adapter : this.adapters) {
			if (adapter.supportsAdvice(advice)) {
				interceptors.add(adapter.getInterceptor(advisor));
			}
		}
		if (interceptors.isEmpty()) {
			throw new UnknownAdviceTypeException(advisor.getAdvice());
		}
		return interceptors.toArray(new MethodInterceptor[interceptors.size()]);
	}

	public void registerAdvisorAdapter(AdvisorAdapter adapter) { //预留了扩展适配器的方法
		this.adapters.add(adapter);
	}
}

代理方法调用分析线 ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed() 方法的调用，这里拦截增强逻辑植入的地方。

public Object proceed() throws Throwable {
		//	我们从第一个currentInterceptorIndex = -1开始，如果currentInterceptorIndex 那么拦截器已经调用完，这时候调用真实的业务方法
		if (this.currentInterceptorIndex == this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.size() - 1) {
			return invokeJoinpoint();
		}

    //从第一个拦截器开始调用
		Object interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice =
		    this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.get(++this.currentInterceptorIndex);
		    // 如果是动态匹配
		  if (interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice instanceof InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) {
			InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher dm =
			    (InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice;
			    //动态匹配时，会考虑到参数，如果匹配就调用
			if (dm.methodMatcher.matches(this.method, this.targetClass, this.arguments)) {
				return dm.interceptor.invoke(this); 
			}
			else {
				//如果动态匹配失败，那么继续进行下一个拦截器调用
				return proceed();
			}
		}
		else {
			// 如果是静态的，那么已经在构造ReflectiveMethodInvocation时，过滤了，都是匹配的拦截器，那么直接调用
			return ((MethodInterceptor) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice).invoke(this);
		}
	}

  //实现思路很简单，就是method 在 target上进行反射调用
  protected Object invokeJoinpoint() throws Throwable {
		return AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(this.target, this.method, this.arguments);
	}

至此，调用分析已经完毕，但是似乎没有看到增强具体的逻辑，其实不然，这些拦截器是对advice封装，让我们看下这些对advice’的拦截器适配的实现。 这些逻辑的封装是在AdvisorAdapter 中的各个实现。

class MethodBeforeAdviceAdapter implements AdvisorAdapter, Serializable {
	public boolean supportsAdvice(Advice advice) {
		return (advice instanceof MethodBeforeAdvice);
	}
	public MethodInterceptor getInterceptor(Advisor advisor) {
		MethodBeforeAdvice advice = (MethodBeforeAdvice) advisor.getAdvice();
		return new MethodBeforeAdviceInterceptor(advice); //如果是MethodBeforeAdvice，那么使用MethodBeforeAdviceInterceptor 进行适配
	}

}

public class MethodBeforeAdviceInterceptor implements MethodInterceptor, Serializable {
	private MethodBeforeAdvice advice;
	public MethodBeforeAdviceInterceptor(MethodBeforeAdvice advice) {
		Assert.notNull(advice, "Advice must not be null");
		this.advice = advice;
	}

	public Object invoke(MethodInvocation mi) throws Throwable {
		this.advice.before(mi.getMethod(), mi.getArguments(), mi.getThis() ); //前置增强的调用，然后继续向下调用
		return mi.proceed();
	}

}

class AfterReturningAdviceAdapter implements AdvisorAdapter, Serializable {
	public boolean supportsAdvice(Advice advice) {
		return (advice instanceof AfterReturningAdvice);
	}
	public MethodInterceptor getInterceptor(Advisor advisor) {
		AfterReturningAdvice advice = (AfterReturningAdvice) advisor.getAdvice();
		return new AfterReturningAdviceInterceptor(advice);
	}

}

public class AfterReturningAdviceInterceptor implements MethodInterceptor, AfterAdvice, Serializable {
	private final AfterReturningAdvice advice;
	public AfterReturningAdviceInterceptor(AfterReturningAdvice advice) {
		Assert.notNull(advice, "Advice must not be null");
		this.advice = advice;
	}
	public Object invoke(MethodInvocation mi) throws Throwable {
		Object retVal = mi.proceed();//先让其他方法调用完，然后才调用自己的后置增强
		this.advice.afterReturning(retVal, mi.getMethod(), mi.getArguments(), mi.getThis());
		return retVal;
	}
}

至此分析完毕，一个简单的spring aop实现ProxyFactory 大致轮廓就是如此！

另外：如果你能清楚的理解下面的输出顺序，并且在随意更改advice添加顺序的情况下，你都能清楚预测出输出顺序，ok，你明白了AfterReturningAdviceInterceptor和MethodBeforeAdviceInterceptor 的invoke方法执行流程啦～

BeforeAdvice1.before() execute

BeforeAdvice2.before() execute

User [username=admin, password=123456, open=false]

AfterAdvice2.afterReturning() execute

AfterAdvice1.afterReturning() execute