背景
最近,我观察到Winform ComboBox控件的两个不良行为:
>将DataSource属性设置为新对象会将SelectedIndex值设置为0
>将DataSource属性设置为以前使用的对象“记住”以前的SelectedIndex值
以下是一些示例代码来说明这一点:
private void Form_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
string[] list1 = new string[] { "A", "B", "C" };
string[] list2 = new string[] { "D", "E", "F" };
Debug.Print("Setting Data Source: list1");
comboBox.DataSource = list1;
Debug.Print("Setting SelectedIndex = 1");
comboBox.SelectedIndex = 1;
Debug.Print("Setting Data Source: list2");
comboBox.DataSource = list2;
Debug.Print("Setting SelectedIndex = 2");
comboBox.SelectedIndex = 2;
Debug.Print("Setting Data Source: list1");
comboBox.DataSource = list1;
this.Close();
}
private void comboBox_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Debug.Print("Selected Index Changed, SelectedIndex: {0}", comboBox.SelectedIndex);
}
private void comboBox_DataSourceChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Debug.Print("Data Source Changed, SelectedIndex: {0}", comboBox.SelectedIndex);
}
这会产生以下输出:
Setting Data Source: list1 Data Source Changed, SelectedIndex: -1 Selected Index Changed, SelectedIndex: 0 Setting SelectedIndex = 1 Selected Index Changed, SelectedIndex: 1 Setting Data Source: list2 Data Source Changed, SelectedIndex: 1 Selected Index Changed, SelectedIndex: 0 Setting SelectedIndex = 2 Selected Index Changed, SelectedIndex: 2 Setting Data Source: list1 Data Source Changed, SelectedIndex: 2 Selected Index Changed, SelectedIndex: 1
这是最后一个特别有趣的调试语句.
问题
这怎么可能,反正是为了防止这种行为?
ComboBox的“内存”是不确定的,还是受到易受垃圾收集影响的对象的支持?前一种情况意味着调整DataSource结果的内存消耗,后一种情况表明ComboBox的行为在设置DataSource时是不可预测的.
最佳答案 我不知道DataSource对象的所有内部工作方式,但它可能是ComboBox保留列表的关联CurrencyManager信息,使其能够在重新连接DataSource时记住先前的位置.
您可以通过将列表包装在新的BindingSource对象中来避免此行为:
comboBox.DataSource = new BindingSource(list1, null);
这将默认position属性返回零(如果有记录).