我有一个单元测试,我试图验证我已经处理了一个曾经附加到主用户界面的文档.单元测试必须是异步的,因为一切都需要在STA线程下运行,我必须等待创建的用户界面.
我有一个帮助程序将动作调度到STA线程.
我在测试的主体中创建了内存对象,然后将其传递给异步方法,如下所示.
请参阅使用###注释的代码行以查看实际问题行. dotMemory报告该对象尚不存在,但我已经做了一个断言,证明该对象确实存在.
(STA Helper课程可在https://gist.github.com/bradphelan/cb4f484fbf6a7f9829de0dd52036fd63找到)
这与async和dotMemory有关吗?
[Collection("Memory leaks")]
public class MemLeakSpec
{
public MemLeakSpec(ITestOutputHelper output)
{
DotMemoryUnitTestOutput.SetOutputMethod(output.WriteLine);
}
[Fact]
[DotMemoryUnit(FailIfRunWithoutSupport = true)]
public void ShouldCollectProjectX()
{
dotMemory.Check (memory => { STAThread.Run(() => ShouldCollectProjectAsyncX(memory)).Wait(); });
}
class Document { }
class Container { public Document Document; };
Document CreateFoo() => new Document();
private async Task ShouldCollectProjectAsyncX(Memory memory)
{
await Task.Delay(TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
Container container = new Container();
memory.GetObjects(@where => @where.Type.Is<Document>())
.ObjectsCount.Should()
.Be(0);
Document documentA = CreateFoo();
container.Document = documentA;
// Verify with dotMemory that the object exists.
// ### This fails even though I have verified
// ### the document exists
memory.GetObjects(@where => @where.Type.Is<Document>())
.ObjectsCount.Should()
.Be(1);
// Open a new project which should dispose the old one and thus
// remove any reference to GenericWeinCadFolder
container.Document = null;
memory.GetObjects(@where => @where.Type.Is<Document>())
.ObjectsCount.Should()
.Be(0);
GC.KeepAlive(container);
}
}
我已经创建了相同的上述测试的同步版本,它不会失败.在ShouldCollectAsync和ShouldCollectSync下面有两个测试.异步的一个失败,同步一个通过.
[Collection("Memory leaks")]
public class MemLeakSpec
{
public MemLeakSpec(ITestOutputHelper output)
{
DotMemoryUnitTestOutput.SetOutputMethod(output.WriteLine);
}
[Fact]
[DotMemoryUnit(FailIfRunWithoutSupport = true)]
public void ShouldCollectAsync()
{
dotMemory.Check (memory => { STAThread.Run(() => ShouldCollectProjectAsyncX(memory)).Wait(); });
}
/// This test is almost identical to the ShouldCollectAsync
/// but it passes
[Fact]
[DotMemoryUnit(FailIfRunWithoutSupport = true)]
public void ShouldCollectSync ()
{
dotMemory.Check (memory => { STAThread.Run(() => ShouldCollectProjectSync(memory)); });
}
class Document { }
class Container { public Document Document; };
Document CreateFoo() => new Document();
private async Task ShouldCollectProjectSync(Memory memory)
{
Container container = new Container();
memory.GetObjects(@where => @where.Type.Is<Document>())
.ObjectsCount.Should()
.Be(0);
Document documentA = CreateFoo();
container.Document = documentA;
// Verify with dotMemory that the object exists.
// #### Passes here
memory.GetObjects(@where => @where.Type.Is<Document>())
.ObjectsCount.Should()
.Be(1);
GC.KeepAlive(documentA);
GC.KeepAlive(container);
}
private async Task ShouldCollectProjectAsyncX(Memory memory)
{
await Task.Delay(TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(50));
Container container = new Container();
memory.GetObjects(@where => @where.Type.Is<Document>())
.ObjectsCount.Should()
.Be(0);
Document documentA = CreateFoo();
container.Document = documentA;
// Verify with dotMemory that the object exists.
// #### FAILS here
memory.GetObjects(@where => @where.Type.Is<Document>())
.ObjectsCount.Should()
.Be(1);
GC.KeepAlive(documentA);
GC.KeepAlive(container);
}
}
最佳答案 dotMemory Unit要求应该从“test”方法调用其所有方法.
想想就像在一开始就调用dotMemoryUnit.TestStart一样
在完成时,应该收集Async和dotMemoryUnit.TestEnd.
你没有公开STAThread.Run的实现,所以我不能给出更详细的建议,但是想法是在async例程完成时等待测试方法.