如何在Java 8中为Stream API实现并行支持takeWhile?

我已经看到了
Java 8流API的一些takeWhile实现,但它们似乎都将流转换为非并行流.例如
this一个:

static <T> Spliterator<T> takeWhile(
    Spliterator<T> splitr, Predicate<? super T> predicate) {
  return new Spliterators.AbstractSpliterator<T>(splitr.estimateSize(), 0) {
    boolean stillGoing = true;
    @Override public boolean tryAdvance(Consumer<? super T> consumer) {
      if (stillGoing) {
        boolean hadNext = splitr.tryAdvance(elem -> {
          if (predicate.test(elem)) {
            consumer.accept(elem);
          } else {
            stillGoing = false;
          }
        });
        return hadNext && stillGoing;
      }
      return false;
    }
  };
}

static <T> Stream<T> takeWhile(Stream<T> stream, Predicate<? super T> predicate) {
   return StreamSupport.stream(takeWhile(stream.spliterator(), predicate), false);
}

这里是StreamSupport.stream(takeWhile(stream.spliterator(),predicate),false);将传递给takeWhile的流转换为顺序流.是否有人知道支持并行流的实现,或者如何修改此代码以使其维护/支持并行流?

最佳答案 如果知道您的源是无序的,那么以下实现应该有效:

static final class UnorderedTakeWhileSpliterator<T> implements Spliterator<T>, Consumer<T>, Cloneable {
    private final Predicate<? super T> predicate;
    private final AtomicBoolean checked = new AtomicBoolean();
    private Spliterator<T> source;
    private T cur;

    UnorderedTakeWhileSpliterator(Spliterator<T> source, Predicate<? super T> predicate) {
        this.predicate = predicate;
        this.source = source;
    }

    @Override
    public void accept(T t) {
        this.cur = t;
    }

    @Override
    public boolean tryAdvance(Consumer<? super T> action) {
        if (!checked.get() && source.tryAdvance(this)) {
            if (predicate.test(cur)) {
                action.accept(cur);
                return true;
            } else {
                checked.set(true);
            }
        }
        return false;
    }

    @Override
    public Spliterator<T> trySplit() {
        Spliterator<T> prefix = source.trySplit();
        if(prefix == null) {
            return null;
        }
        if(checked.get()) {
            return Spliterators.emptySpliterator();
        }
        UnorderedTakeWhileSpliterator<T> clone;
        try {
            clone = (UnorderedTakeWhileSpliterator<T>) clone();
        } catch (CloneNotSupportedException e) {
            throw new InternalError(e);
        }
        clone.source = prefix;
        return clone;
    }

    @Override
    public long estimateSize() {
        return source.estimateSize();
    }

    @Override
    public int characteristics() {
        return source.characteristics() & (DISTINCT | SORTED | NONNULL);
    }

    @Override
    public Comparator<? super T> getComparator() {
        return source.getComparator();
    }
}

使用以下方法创建流:

static <T> Stream<T> takeWhile(Stream<T> stream, Predicate<? super T> predicate) {
   return StreamSupport.stream(UnorderedTakeWhileSpliterator<>(stream.spliterator(), predicate), stream.isParallel());
}

有序实现会更加棘手,因为它应该缓冲非前缀项并将取消传播到后缀.像这样的东西在JDK-9中实现(不是作为分裂器,而是作为普通的流操作),但我怀疑即使这个棘手的实现在许多情况下也会胜过顺序流.

点赞