我遇到的问题是我能够使用用于加密数据的相同RSA 2048位公钥解密数据.在我看来,如果一个公钥可以解密它,这首先会破坏加密数据的全部目的.我此时唯一可以考虑的是,当我认为我正在生成非对称对时,我正在生成对称密钥交换对.
最终用户的目的是稍后使用它来传输用户凭证,以便在远离办公室使用应用程序时进行身份验证,此时我无法使用域中工作站的缓存凭据.理论上,我只能使用私钥解密这些凭据.
我已经制作了一个简单的测试类和代码来重现我的问题.我正在采取的步骤如下:
>获取Microsoft Enhanced Cryptographic Provider v1.0的上下文
>生成公钥/私钥对.
>将公钥和私钥BLOB导出为单独的文件.
>加载公钥并加密一些简单的文本.
>尝试使用公钥解密相同的加密文本(我希望它在这里失败,除非我使用私钥时 – 但两者都有效).
TestEncryptDecrypt帮助程序类:TestEncryptDecrypt.h
#pragma once
#include <Windows.h>
#include <wincrypt.h>
class TestEncryptDecrypt
{
public:
TestEncryptDecrypt()
{
}
~TestEncryptDecrypt()
{
if (hKey != NULL)
CryptDestroyKey(hKey);
if (hProvider != NULL)
CryptReleaseContext(hProvider, 0);
}
BOOL InitializeProvider(LPCTSTR pszProvider, DWORD dwProvType)
{
if (hProvider != NULL)
{
if (!CryptReleaseContext(hProvider, 0))
return 0;
}
return CryptAcquireContext(&hProvider, NULL, pszProvider, dwProvType, 0);
}
BOOL Generate2048BitKeys(ALG_ID Algid)
{
DWORD dwFlags = (0x800 << 16) | CRYPT_EXPORTABLE;
return CryptGenKey(hProvider, Algid, dwFlags, &hKey);
}
VOID ExportPrivatePublicKey(LPTSTR lpFileName)
{
if (hKey == NULL)
return;
DWORD dwDataLen = 0;
BOOL exportResult = CryptExportKey(hKey, NULL, PRIVATEKEYBLOB, 0, NULL, &dwDataLen);
LPBYTE lpKeyBlob = (LPBYTE)malloc(dwDataLen);
exportResult = CryptExportKey(hKey, NULL, PRIVATEKEYBLOB, 0, lpKeyBlob, &dwDataLen);
WriteBytesFile(lpFileName, lpKeyBlob, dwDataLen);
free(lpKeyBlob);
}
VOID ExportPublicKey(LPTSTR lpFileName)
{
if (hKey == NULL)
return;
DWORD dwDataLen = 0;
BOOL exportResult = CryptExportKey(hKey, NULL, PUBLICKEYBLOB, 0, NULL, &dwDataLen);
LPBYTE lpKeyBlob = (LPBYTE)malloc(dwDataLen);
exportResult = CryptExportKey(hKey, NULL, PUBLICKEYBLOB, 0, lpKeyBlob, &dwDataLen);
WriteBytesFile(lpFileName, lpKeyBlob, dwDataLen);
free(lpKeyBlob);
}
BOOL ImportKey(LPTSTR lpFileName)
{
if (hProvider == NULL)
return 0;
if (hKey != NULL)
CryptDestroyKey(hKey);
LPBYTE lpKeyContent = NULL;
DWORD dwDataLen = 0;
ReadBytesFile(lpFileName, &lpKeyContent, &dwDataLen);
BOOL importResult = CryptImportKey(hProvider, lpKeyContent, dwDataLen, 0, 0, &hKey);
delete[] lpKeyContent;
return importResult;
}
BOOL EncryptDataWriteToFile(LPTSTR lpSimpleDataToEncrypt, LPTSTR lpFileName)
{
DWORD SimpleDataToEncryptLength = _tcslen(lpSimpleDataToEncrypt)*sizeof(TCHAR);
DWORD BufferLength = SimpleDataToEncryptLength * 10;
BYTE *EncryptedBuffer = new BYTE[BufferLength];
SecureZeroMemory(EncryptedBuffer, BufferLength);
CopyMemory(EncryptedBuffer, lpSimpleDataToEncrypt, SimpleDataToEncryptLength);
BOOL cryptResult = CryptEncrypt(hKey, NULL, TRUE, 0, EncryptedBuffer, &SimpleDataToEncryptLength, BufferLength);
DWORD dwGetLastError = GetLastError();
WriteBytesFile(lpFileName, EncryptedBuffer, SimpleDataToEncryptLength);
delete[] EncryptedBuffer;
return cryptResult;
}
BOOL DecryptDataFromFile(LPBYTE *lpDecryptedData, LPTSTR lpFileName, DWORD *dwDecryptedLen)
{
if (hKey == NULL)
return 0;
LPBYTE lpEncryptedData = NULL;
DWORD dwDataLen = 0;
ReadBytesFile(lpFileName, &lpEncryptedData, &dwDataLen);
BOOL decryptResult = CryptDecrypt(hKey, NULL, TRUE, 0, lpEncryptedData, &dwDataLen);
*dwDecryptedLen = dwDataLen;
//WriteBytesFile(L"decryptedtest.txt", lpEncryptedData, dwDataLen);
*lpDecryptedData = new BYTE[dwDataLen + 1];
SecureZeroMemory(*lpDecryptedData, dwDataLen + 1);
CopyMemory(*lpDecryptedData, lpEncryptedData, dwDataLen);
delete[]lpEncryptedData;
return decryptResult;
}
VOID WriteBytesFile(LPTSTR lpFileName, BYTE *content, DWORD dwDataLen)
{
HANDLE hFile = CreateFile(lpFileName, GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE, 0x7, NULL, CREATE_ALWAYS, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL, NULL);
DWORD dwBytesWritten = 0;
WriteFile(hFile, content, dwDataLen, &dwBytesWritten, NULL);
CloseHandle(hFile);
}
private:
HCRYPTPROV hProvider = NULL;
HCRYPTKEY hKey = NULL;
VOID ReadBytesFile(LPTSTR lpFileName, BYTE **content, DWORD *dwDataLen)
{
HANDLE hFile = CreateFile(lpFileName, GENERIC_READ, 0x7, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL, NULL);
DWORD dwFileLength = 0;
DWORD dwBytesToRead = GetFileSize(hFile, NULL);
DWORD dwBytesRead = 0;
*content = new BYTE[dwBytesToRead + 1];
SecureZeroMemory(*content, dwBytesToRead + 1);
ReadFile(hFile, *content, dwBytesToRead, &dwBytesRead, NULL);
*dwDataLen = dwBytesRead;
CloseHandle(hFile);
}
};
测试代码:主.cpp文件
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "TestEncryptDecrypt.h"
#include <Windows.h>
#include <wincrypt.h>
int main()
{
TestEncryptDecrypt *edc = new TestEncryptDecrypt();
//Initialize the provider
edc->InitializeProvider(MS_ENHANCED_PROV, PROV_RSA_FULL);
//Generate a 2048-bit asymmetric key pair
edc->Generate2048BitKeys(CALG_RSA_KEYX);
//Export the private / public key pair
edc->ExportPrivatePublicKey(L"privpubkey.txt");
//Export only the public key
edc->ExportPublicKey(L"pubkey.txt");
//Import the public key (destroys the private/public key pair already set)
edc->ImportKey(L"pubkey.txt");
//Encrypt and write some test data to file
edc->EncryptDataWriteToFile(TEXT("Hello World!ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"), L"encrypteddata.txt");
//Decrypt the data from file using the same public key (this should fail but it doesn't)
DWORD dwDataLen = 0;
LPBYTE lpDecryptedData = NULL;
edc->DecryptDataFromFile(&lpDecryptedData, L"encrypteddata.txt", &dwDataLen);
//Write the supposedly decrypted data to another file
edc->WriteBytesFile(L"decrypteddata.txt", lpDecryptedData, dwDataLen);
//Clear data
delete[] lpDecryptedData;
delete edc;
return 0;
}
不幸的是,我没有机会经常使用C,所以你可能会注意到一些问题.随意批评建设性.
有谁知道为什么我能够使用相同的公钥解密数据?
我的目标是能够在客户端进行不可逆转的加密,只能在服务器上解密,私钥将隐藏在服务器上.
编辑:
我曾经认为hKey没有被ImportKey方法正确销毁,所以我写了这个测试用例(相同的结果 – 公钥可以加密和解密数据):
// CPPTests.cpp : Defines the entry point for the console application.
//
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "TestEncryptDecrypt.h"
#include <Windows.h>
#include <wincrypt.h>
int main()
{
TestEncryptDecrypt *edc = new TestEncryptDecrypt();
//Initialize the provider
edc->InitializeProvider(MS_ENHANCED_PROV, PROV_RSA_FULL);
//Generate a 2048-bit asymmetric key pair
edc->Generate2048BitKeys(CALG_RSA_KEYX);
//Export the private / public key pair
edc->ExportPrivatePublicKey(L"privpubkey.txt");
//Export only the public key
edc->ExportPublicKey(L"pubkey.txt");
//Destroy everything and load up only the public key to write some encrypted data
delete edc;
edc = new TestEncryptDecrypt();
edc->InitializeProvider(MS_ENHANCED_PROV, PROV_RSA_FULL);
edc->ImportKey(L"pubkey.txt");
//Encrypt and write some test data to file
edc->EncryptDataWriteToFile(TEXT("Hello World!ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"), L"encrypteddata.txt");
//Destroy everything and load up only the public key to read some encrypted data
delete edc;
edc = new TestEncryptDecrypt();
edc->InitializeProvider(MS_ENHANCED_PROV, PROV_RSA_FULL);
edc->ImportKey(L"pubkey.txt");
//Decrypt the data from file using the same public key (this should fail but it doesn't)
DWORD dwDataLen = 0;
LPBYTE lpDecryptedData = NULL;
edc->DecryptDataFromFile(&lpDecryptedData, L"encrypteddata.txt", &dwDataLen);
//Write the supposedly decrypted data to another file
edc->WriteBytesFile(L"decrypteddata.txt", lpDecryptedData, dwDataLen);
//Clear data
delete[] lpDecryptedData;
delete edc;
return 0;
}
最佳答案 经过一些与同样问题的斗争,我意识到错误在哪里.
在您的第一个代码中,您获取了上下文,并将最后一个标志设置为零:
CryptAcquireContext(&hProvider, NULL, pszProvider, dwProvType, 0);
但是在您的解决方案中,您将其更改为CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT.
CryptAcquireContext(&hProvider, NULL, NULL, PROV_RSA_FULL, CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT);
您通过更改此标志解决了您的问题,而不是从OpenSSL导入密钥.我很确定如果你在初始代码中测试它,它将按预期工作.
此CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT标志负责不允许密钥在系统中实现持久性,这种持久性使公共RSA能够加密和解密.