我正在尝试使用Ansible来配置AWS EC2安全组.
我希望其中一些组有多个规则.有些规则仅适用于我的内部VPC,而其他规则则适用于全世界.
我想在一个从列表变量中读取配置的循环中创建安全组,但我不想为内部VPC硬编码CIDR.我宁愿从我的VPC事实中获得CIDR,但我还没有找到一种令人满意的方法来将CIDR替换为规则.
为了更清楚,这是一个(人为的)例子.我原来的小组列表中所有的CIDR都是硬编码的:
aws_security_groups:
- name: Webservers
description: Security group for webservers
region: my_aws_region
rules:
- proto: tcp
from_port: 22
to_port: 22
cidr_ip: 0.0.0.0/0
- proto: tcp
from_port: 80
to_port: 80
cidr_ip: 0.0.0.0/0
- name: Databases
description: Security group for internal database access
region: my_aws_region
rules:
- proto: tcp
from_port: 22
to_port: 22
cidr_ip: 0.0.0.0/0
- proto: tcp
from_port: 3306
to_port: 3306
cidr_ip: <vpc.cidr.hard.coded/16>
原作很有效,非常简单:
- name: Provision EC2 security groups
ec2_group:
name: "{{ item.name }}"
description: "{{ item.description }}"
region: "{{ item.region }}"
state: present
rules: "{{ item.rules }}"
with_items: "{{ aws_security_groups }}"
我可以添加或减去规则,并知道这些组将被同步.但是,我不想硬编码CIDR …我希望我的组列表看起来像:
aws_security_groups:
- name: Webservers
description: Security group for webservers
region: my_aws_region
rules:
- proto: tcp
from_port: 22
to_port: 22
cidr_ip: all
- proto: tcp
from_port: 80
to_port: 80
cidr_ip: all
- name: Databases
description: Security group for internal database access
region: my_aws_region
rules:
- proto: tcp
from_port: 22
to_port: 22
cidr_ip: all
- proto: tcp
from_port: 3306
to_port: 3306
cidr_ip: internal
我目前的策略是使用with_subelements为每个规则分别运行一堆ec2_group命令:
- name: Gather EC2 VPC facts
ec2_vpc_net_facts:
region: my_aws_region
register: vpcs
- name: Provision EC2 security groups
ec2_group:
name: "{{ item.0.name }}"
description: "{{ item.0.description }}"
region: "{{ item.0.region }}"
state: present
purge_rules: false
rules:
- from_port: "{{ item.1.from_port }}"
to_port: "{{ item.1.to_port }}"
proto: "{{ item.1.proto }}"
cidr_ip: "{{ (item.1.cidr_ip == 'internal') | ternary(vpcs.vpcs.0.cidr_block, (item.1.cidr_ip == 'all') | ternary('0.0.0.0/0', item.1.cidr_ip)) }}"
with_subelements:
- "{{ aws_security_groups }}"
- rules
替换工作,但我有一些不舒服的权衡.
首先,我必须关闭purge_rules,因为如果不这样做,每个循环都会删除先前的规则.因此,如果我对规则进行更改,我可能会遇到旧规则,我需要跟踪和清理.
其次,嵌套的三元组很笨拙,不易扩展.
第三,当一个人足够时,我正在打多个电话.
我觉得我错过了一些显而易见的东西,或者说我过于复杂了.如何在Ansible剧本中完成CIDR替换,或更一般地说,这种替换?替代是优选的还是有更好的方法来完成相同的任务?
非常感谢任何帮助.
最佳答案 以下方法可以避免purge_rules问题,而且更清洁,imho.
任务:
- set_fact:
from_template: "{{ lookup('template', './template.j2') }}"
vars:
to_template_aws_security_groups: "{{ aws_security_groups }}"
to_template_vpcs: "{{ vpcs }}"
- name: Provision EC2 security groups
ec2_group:
name: "{{ item.name }}"
description: "{{ item.description }}"
region: "{{ item.region }}"
state: present
rules: "{{ item.rules }}"
with_items: "{{ from_template.aws_security_groups }}"
template.j2:
{
"aws_security_groups": [
{% for aws_security_group in to_template_aws_security_groups %}
{
"description": "{{ aws_security_group.description }}",
"name": "{{ aws_security_group.name }}",
"region": "{{ aws_security_group.region }}",
"rules": [
{% for rule in aws_security_group.rules %}
{
"cidr_ip": "{{ (rule.cidr_ip == 'internal') | ternary(to_template_vpcs.vpcs.0.cidr_block, (rule.cidr_ip == 'all') | ternary('0.0.0.0/0', rule.cidr_ip)) }}",
"from_port": "{{ rule.from_port }}",
"proto": "{{ rule.proto }}",
"to_port": {{ rule.to_port }}
}{% if not loop.last %},{% endif %}
{% endfor %}
]
}{% if not loop.last %},{% endif %}
{% endfor %}
]
}